Join discussions around Veeam community projects, Veeam events, industry and technology news
Recently active
Happy Friday Community 😻We're back. And this one might be our most controversial debate yet.There are two kinds of Veeam administrators. Those who would never join their backup infrastructure to Active Directory. And those who think running it any other way is unnecessary complexity.Both are convinced they're right.Debate Statement Joining your Veeam backup infrastructure (VBR server, proxies, repositories, Enterprise Manager, etc.) to Active Directory is a security mistake. ( thank you @DChiavari for this one 😎) If your backup infrastructure is the last line of defense, why should it trust the very identity platform attackers are most likely to compromise?A workgroup or isolated environment can reduce the attack surface, limit lateral movement, and keep backups operational even when Active Directory is offline. But is the extra security worth the operational overhead? Or are we solving a problem that good security practices already address?What I'm looking for this round Forget ven
What's in Your Veeam Toolbox?Every incident has a commander. The person everyone turns to when things don't go as planned. The one who knows exactly which workflow to follow, which Veeam feature to use, and how to get everything back on track.This SysAdmin Day, we're celebrating the knowledge and experience that make all the difference when it matters most. We want to know: what's the one Veeam tip that's always in your toolbox?Every year, on the last Friday of July, we celebrate System Administrator Appreciation Day (SysAdmin Day)—a day dedicated to the people who keep everything running behind the scenes.Whether it's recovering from a ransomware attack, fixing a backup job before anyone notices, or somehow making yesterday's "urgent" request disappear before the morning coffee kicks in, sysadmins are the ones who keep IT moving.Every sysadmin has those little tricks they've picked up over the years. The shortcut that saves time, the workflow they've perfected, or the Veeam feature th
We are back!Episode 1 sparked some strong input, but also a bit too much alignment 😄So this time, we decided to make it harder.I asked @ddomask to help me shape a statement that would force a real split — not an obvious answer.Debate Statement “Tape is dead — stop living in the past and use a real archival solution like Object Storage or dedicated deduplication appliances.”Tape had it's heyday, but so did IRC. True data resilience requires a modern solution, and you can only get that with a vendor-supported archiving service / appliances, and you can get both on the cheap without having to spend a fortune on hardware and maintenance. Your data will always be safe with one of these more modern options.What I’m looking for this roundNo theory. No safe answers.I want:Where tape still wins in practice Where modern solutions fall short in real environments The trade-offs you’ve had to make at scaleDon’t aim to agree — aim to challenge the statement with real-world experience.New here? Q
Another debate, another reminder of why I love this format. Thank you to everyone who took part in Episode 2 of our Oxford Style Debate. It was great to see so many well-reasoned arguments, different viewpoints, and real-world experiences shared throughout the discussion.This month's statement was:"Tape is dead — stop living in the past and use a real archival solution like Object Storage or dedicated deduplication appliances."To help select this month's winners, I invited @Mildur from Product Management to review the discussion and share his perspective.A huge thank you to Fabian for sharing his expertise and helping identify the most insightful arguments from both sides of the debate.Winner Against “Tape is dead” - @matheusgiovanini '’matheusgiovanini made the strongest case against the statement by sharing a real recovery scenario from his own experience. In his mentioned case, the backup server, repositories, and storage replication were all compromised, and offline tape was the
Good day Community,Back from vacation straight into the big guns — so here it goes 🙂Has anyone started looking at Veeam Intelligent ResOps for Microsoft 365 yet?It feels like an interesting shift — less about backup in the traditional sense and more about adding context and intelligence around M365 resilience decisions.Curious how it’s being seen so far:Does it feel like a real step toward “resilience intelligence,” or more like an extension of existing reporting? Is it actually changing how teams prioritize or make decisions, or is it still mostly visibility on top of what we already had? And does it feel meaningfully different compared to what others are doing in the space?Would be great to hear some early thoughts from people already exploring it.Best, Madi
We know AI is becoming a normal part of how people create content, and lately we’ve been seeing more of it show up in the Community Hub.That said, posts that are mostly AI-generated don’t really add the kind of value this community is built on—especially when that same information can be created by anyone using the same tools.What we’re really looking for is your experience: real-world scenarios, hands-on demos, lessons learned, and practical insights from what you’re actually doing day to day. That’s what makes the community useful and interesting for everyone.Also, content that is primarily AI-generated won’t be considered as part of the criteria for becoming a Legend or Vanguard.So if you’re sharing, try to lead with your own voice and perspective—that’s the part that really matters.
Hey Community, I received a few messages from community members asking how to get notifications when there is a new content published (in this case we talked about “Blogs and Podcasts” category). I thought I would do a quick post about it. First, there is a possibility to subscribe to every category at Community Hub Let’s say, you would like to subscribe to “Blogs and Podcasts” category. To do so, you have to push ‘SUBSCRIBE’ button at the right side as shown at the screenshot below: Once it’s done - you will start receiving notifications about new topics created!Again, you can get subscribed to any category: whether it’s Discussion boards or News. You can also manage notification settings at your profile.If you experience any issues with notifications - please let me know!
All Veeam jobs are started failing (VMware Snapshot/Agent/Offload) suddenly with error Job cannot be started timeout 901 sec. we are on 12.3.2 version. Any suggestions or guidance is highly appreciated.Its started working fine post restart of services.
I noticed that every REST API request, including the access token request (POST /api/oauth2/token), requires the x-api-version header (for example 1.3-rev1).So I wanted to check if is there any REST API endpoint that returns the supported x-api-version (or REST API revision) without requiring the x-api-version header?
Hello everyone,I'm reaching out today because we're experiencing performance issues with our Veeam backups. More specifically, I find that both the incremental backup duration and the Synthetic Full backup duration are extremely long.Here's a quick overview of our current physical infrastructure:Veeam Backup Server running as a virtual machine (connected at 10 Gbps) - 13.0.2.29 Backup Repository: Synology RS2418+ (Intel Atom C3538, 4 GB RAM, no SSD cache, connected at 10 Gbps) Disks: Disk 1: WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 Disk 2: WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 Disk 3: WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 Disk 4: WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 Disk 5: WDC WD80EFPX-68C4ZN0 (recently added, hence the different model) For every backup job, the bottleneck consistently shows "Target".Backup configurationWe currently have two backup jobs:Job 1Selected production servers Incremental backups: Monday to Friday, starting at 7:00 PM Synthetic Full: Saturday (same start time, as it's not possible to schedule a Synthetic Full earlier than t
Happy Tuesday, Veeam Community!Madalina is away this week, so I am filling in to share the nominations for July’s Blog of the Month. Even with the summer holidays, we had 42 blogs shared this month (!) making picking the nominations pretty difficult as there is so much amazing content. 🤓Congrats to the 6 nominees @falkob @EdwinMoraal @fabian.papenfuss @Scott @Dynamic @kciolek 👏Take a read and select your favorite. The winner will be announced next Tuesday, August 4.July Blog of the Month Nominations:
Backup job finished with Failed, Job details: Job cannot be started. Timeout 904 sec, Job has failed unexpectedlyEven the scheduled config backup job did not progress , veeam version 12.3.2All the veeam services are running fine. Kindly advise
Hello Community.I was asked by Packt Publishing if there are any influencers out there with a blog/vlog that would be interested in doing a book giveaway for a physical copy and e-book (PDF)?If you are, reach out to me via DM and I can also see for the person who does the giveaway about getting a copy of the book as well.Look forward to hearing back as I am trying to work on some traction with the book sales.Cheers - Chris
How to back up company data on a QNAP NAS? What are my options?
We changed the IP address of a NAS used as a CIFS/SMB backup repository. The repository was originally configured using a UNC path with a hardcoded IP address and is now showing as Unavailable because the old IP is no longer reachable.Veaam ver 12.3.2Current situation:Repository type: CIFS/SMB Old repository path: \\192.168.0.8\NAS New repository path: \\192.168.0.81\NAS\Backups Repository is not listed under Get-VBRServer; it is only visible via Get-VBRBackupRepository, so KB1905 (managed server rename) does not apply. A new repository was added using the updated NAS path. When attempting to map existing backups to the new repository, Veeam requests moving the backup files from the old repository. This operation cannot proceed because the old repository path is no longer accessible. Creating a new backup chain is currently not an option due to storage constraints.Looking for the supported and safest approach to transition the existing backup chains and jobs to the new NAS repository
I’m getting the below error after upgrading Veeam servers from v12 to the latest release of v13. It’s a windows based install of Veeam, and it is connected to a (dedicated to Veeam only) AD domain.My user has local administrator permissions, Veeam Backup Administrator permissions, and MFA disabled for testing/troubleshooting purposes. The is happening across each of the Veeam v13 servers I have on the domain.It is only happening for mine and one other engineer’s user accounts, but other engineer’s accounts are not affected. We are all in the same AD groups so permissions are the same.I have tried removing Veeam Backup Administrator permissions from my account, rebooting, and re-adding, to no effect.Has anyone seen this before? Any suggestions for what else to check? In the meantime I have a case open with Veeam support, and hoping they can come up with something.Relevant logs:[19.01.2026 21:07:36.194] <126> Error (1) Veeam.Backup.IdentityService.Shared.CSystemAccountProvid
7/27/2026 9:50:42 AM Failed : Failed to perform post-processing: Cannot find the backup file < XXXX_XXXXX>This is a copy job, I have rescanned the repo and as well tried initiating full backup for this VM at source, still the error exists with copy job.The copy job is immutable and can find new .vbk file created .Kindly advise.
Community,Wasabi has made a MCP (Model Context Protocol) server available to access stand-alone accounts as well as control accounts. Toolsets include: S3, IAM, and WACM (Wasabi Account Control Manager).All of the details are available here - https://wasabi.com/cloud-object-storage/mcp-for-aiNow you can utilize natural language queries to see practically anything you’d want to know about your account settings, utilization, and users. I can imagine easily integrating these tools into a support agent at your favorite MSP…
We have a few clients that have a single physical server and have a service or application that is already using port 443. So when we attempt to upgrade from v12 to v13, it won’t install since 443 is being used and v13 uses it for the Veeam Web Service. Assuming we can temporarily disable this service/app to get the upgrade to complete, is there a way once v13 is installed to get the Veeam Web Service to use a different port?
Hello,I’m currently testing Veeam v13 using the appliance‑based deployment and love the infrastructure. I have few issues, so not sure if the appliances are limitation to those issues.So far I have the following components installed: VBR (appliance) Hardened Repository (appliance) Proxy (appliance) Enterprise manager (appliance) VeeamOne (windows server - non domain joined) First issueVeeam ONE is installed on a Windows Server, but I’m unable to add the VBR server to it.The error I receive is: “Veeam Analytics Service on the remote server is not running.” I attempted also a manual installation of the Analytics Service, and I can confirm that the service is running on the VBR sidevia manual installation or via VeeamOne installation.Data collection access is allowed, and all components are within the same L2 segment, so there are no firewall issues.Second issueI am not able to add EM to VeeamOne, it provides me that account does not have premissions. (Tried with veeamadmin wi
Hi All, Would it be possible to replace or update the OpenSSL component only on the Veeam Agent for Windows [v13.0.3.1220] due to the Critical bug below, or is it better to wait until Veeam released the latest update ? Recommended Action: Download and install patches as instructedDescription:A heap buffer overflow from converting large OCTET STRINGs to hex on 32 bit OpenSSL may crash or allow code execution; caused by 32 bit multiplication overflow; affects non FIPS OpenSSL 3.x on 32 bit systems.Affected Products:OpenSSLCVE IDs:CVE-2026-31789Vendor Information:https://www.openssl.org/news/vulnerabilities.htmlVendor Patch Download:https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Binaries Thank you,
We are planning to upgrade Veeam Backup & Replication from v12 to v13, and I understand that PostgreSQL will be upgraded from version 15 to version 17 during the upgrade process.After completing our validation, including backup and restore tests, we would like to uninstall PostgreSQL 15 from the VBR server.Could anyone share the recommended procedure for safely removing PostgreSQL 15 after the upgrade? Are there any prerequisites or checks that should be performed before uninstalling it?Thank you in advance for your help.
We are a vmware shop, being priced out. Many factors pushing us toward Hyper-V.I understand that in the early days ReFS was bug-ridden in multiple aspects.Going forward with Windows 2025 CORE Hyper-V, with VM’s of Windows2022, RHEL 9, and a few linux-based OVA deployments, what is the community recommendation for the format of the iSCSI LUNs that the VM’s run from? there will be sizes from a couple hundred GB to all the way to 6TB, and in a special case 20TB.Our Veeam Repos are XFS, so not a factor here.Thank you kindly
Hi everyone,We're currently using the new Veeam Backup & Replication v13 Appliance and have a question regarding post-backup automation.In our previous Windows-based Veeam installation, we had a scheduled task that would automatically shut down the backup server after the backup job had completed successfully. This worked well for our 3-2-1 backup strategy, as the backup server only needed to be online during the backup window.After migrating to the v13 Appliance, we can't seem to find a similar option or supported method to automatically power off the appliance once all backup jobs have finished.Has anyone implemented this on the v13 Appliance? Is there a built-in feature, or is there a recommended approach for scheduling an automatic shutdown after all backup jobs have completed?Any suggestions or best practices would be appreciated.
Hello everyone, I am looking to schedule daily backup jobs and copy jobs reports using powershell in veeam backup server. Could you please provide me the suitable script for reports as per jobname, server, latest backup run time, status. Backup version is 13.0
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
