Community

Well some good news for those that are fans of my previous three books, today I was able to get my hands on something that will allow me to start the outline and process for the fourth book on v13.  Looking forward to delivering a fresh new take of Veeam v13 with the new appliance model and the JeOS ISO servers.I will also be covering the AI pieces as well that have been put in to the latest releases along with the new VONE v13.  I will see about the Windows version upgrade path and depending how long that takes might skip it from the book and just go with the appliance since this to me is the future.So hold on to your hats and hopefully I can aim to get this out early 2026.  If there are specific topics anyone wants to see covered feel free to post them here or DM me if you like. 😎

Dear Community, If you're a Veeam Cloud & Service Provider (VCSP), support workflows is a routine part of daily operations. Traditionally, raising support tickets with Veeam support involved a manual, time consuming process, collecting logs from tenant VBR servers or Agents, navigating remote access restrictions, and uploading everything to the my.veeam.com portal for investigation. This added unnecessary delays, especially when dealing with restricted environments or needing approvals. With the Veeam Service Provider Console (VSPC), the entire process is streamlined. You can now open tickets directly from the VSPC portal, whether for your own infrastructure or tenant or a reseller and automatically attach the relevant logs. It’s a great improvement and significantly saves time creating support tickets and collecting the required log information. It also speeds up the investigation for Veeam Support Engineers, as they already have the logs from the beginning and don’t need to reque

Recently I had to configure a backup on a physical Linux server that stores over half a petabyte of traffic fine images collected from speed cameras on federal highways in Brazil.   The catch: this server runs critical client applications, and any migration to another server is extremely sensitive and requires careful planning before taking action. At the moment, a full migration wasn’t feasible.Due to the urgency of the demand, it was necessary to implement a backup solution immediately, but the server cannot go down for even one minute. Any downtime would mean fines not being recorded, resulting in immediate financial loss.  The Challenge of Backing Up a Mission-Critical Environment The client required backup implementation for compliance reasons. I use Veeam Agent for Linux, configuring the backup job at the volume level. To avoid impacting main traffic, I limited the throughput to 50 Mbps using Veeam’s throttling feature.     Everything seemed well planned, until I ran the first ba

More and more companies are depending totally of their ICT infrastructure (on-premises, private cloud, hybrid cloud, public cloud) …Ransomware and hackers are more popular than ever…Therefore one of the most important things is that the company has a solid backup strategy, so we can fall back at those in case of disaster or being impacted by ransomware or hackers.You can find very often the 3-2-1 rule. I suggest every customer or company to even go a step further : apply the 3-2-1-1-0 rule !3 : Maintain at least 3 copies of your data By three copies, I mean that in addition to your primary data, you should also have at least two more backups.Why?The chance that something is going wrong with 3 devices at the same time is a lot smaller than with 2 devices, especially when the primary backup is often situated close to the primary data. In case of a disaster the primary data and primary backup could be gone. The secondary backup is often situated somewhere else and could be the solution in

We've got a new blog post! This month, we're diving into the art of fine-tuning Veeam VBR for on-prem object storage. In this post we show how to optimize performance for Scale-Out Backup Repositories (SOBR) with a Capacity Tier, specifically addressing the challenges of using on-premises S3-compatible appliances. This with the registry key “S3ConcurrentTaskLimit”Click here to read the full blog post and learn more about Veeam registry keys! 

A customer uses the copy function for capacity tier to instantly copy on-premises Veeam backups (retention of 30 days) to object storage. They’ve configured object lock on the object storage (60 days) that has a duration longer than the local backup policy. As Veeam cannot delete a backup in object storage at 30 days, will it delete it after the object lock expires (60 days) or does the customer need to manually delete the  files on object storage?My thoughts are Veeam will clean up those files once the the 60 day lock has expired, but got me scratching my head for sure

Hello,We have three ESXi servers connected to our Nimble storage using a Brocade Fibre Channel switch, each ESXi server connects to Nimble storage with individual zone as: ESXi1_Nimble, ESXi2_Nimble, ESXi3_Nimbe.A few months after this configuration was done, we added a physical server for Veeam B&R v12 as backup server and repository, which is also a backup proxy server. This is connected to the same FC switch and I created zone between the Veeam B&R server and the Nimble storage as:  VeeamBR_NimbleAnd most recently, we added a HPE tape library to this mix for GFS tape backups. Added the library to the FC switch and created a zone between VeeamBR_HPETapeDrive. Each night, the Veeam B&R server runs backup jobs then stores into its local repository (D: drive). Then it runs backup to tape, which writes from the Veeam B&R backup repository into tape drive. I have already configured "Direct storage access" while configuring Backup proxy's Transport mode. The backup jobs do

 Upgrading from 12.3.0.310 to 12.3.2.3617 stopped at the database check with “Failed to connect to PostgreSQL server localhost:5432.” The fix was to map the exact Windows identity that launched setup in pg_ident.conf, restart PostgreSQL, and rerun the installer. No reinstall needed. Environment Single VBR on Windows Server 2022 with multiple NICs for LAN and storage Local workgroup admin account Embedded PostgreSQL 15 for the configuration database What I saw During the Configuration Check I got:Failed to connect to PostgreSQL server localhost:5432.An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote hostDaily jobs were fine, which told me services already had access. The installer, running under my current login, did not.What I checked first Live installer logI tailed the newest SuiteEngine log to see exactly where setup stalled:Get-Content -Wait (Get-ChildItem 'C:\ProgramData\Veeam\Setup\Temp\SuiteEngine_*' -File | Sort-Object LastWriteTime -Descending | Select-Object -Expan

The Task at Hand, or the problem to solveAs a service provider that is actively growing our BaaS offering, one major source or growth is Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365.  While it’s relatively easy to understand rental license consumption when backing up VM’s (number of projected workloads * points per license utilized), figuring out how many licenses consumed in VB365 is much more difficult on the surface because, depending on how you’ve selected your objects to be backed up from Microsoft 365 such as selection via groups, you clearly can protect many more objects than you’ve manually selected and consume more licenses.  And some objects don’t consume licenses.  If you have a dedicated VB365 server for each Organization, perhaps this would be easier.  But in my case, we have a single VB365 server orchestrating backups for multiple organizations/tenants.  But I need to know how many licenses I’m consuming per Org so that I know how much to bill them, or to make sure they’re within the c

The latest update is available for this popular NetApp E-Series technical report with Veeam Backup and Replication. The E-Series SAN models are used for a repository target. It does not have an immutable option in the SANTricity storage operating system. It is paired with our Veeam Hardened Repo appliance. The NetApp E-Series is a block only storage hardware. From hybrid to powerful all flash arrays. It provides value-based storage alternative to NetApp ONTAP clusters. The customer uses case besides backup are AI, HPC and video surveillance solutions. Please see link below for the public download of the TR. This TR has contributions from ​@MatzeB  who is a member of the Veeam 100, and he works for Advanced UNIBYTE a Veeam and NetApp partner.NetApp E-Series storage and Veeam Backup and Replication TR Cover Page 

Fresh install of VBR 12.1.0.2131. New user. Not using Azure. Hyper-V VMs on Server 2016, V.1607, Build 14393.6614. I get: 6/02/2024 10:01:35 AM Warning Failed to connect to AWS plug-in: Failed to login to platform service: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it [2001:0:348b:fb58:34c2:214d:c31d:5c8d]:9402 6/02/2024 10:01:39 AM Warning Failed to connect to Microsoft Azure plug-in: Failed to login to platform service: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it [2001:0:348b:fb58:34c2:214d:c31d:5c8d]:20443 Backup and backup copy to removable media working well. Any ideas?

In this short guide, I will highlight the steps to upgrade Veeam Backup and Replication v12.3.x to 12.3.2. This update for 12.3.2 (Build 12.3.2.3617) was released June 17, 2024). Upgrading to the latest version of Veeam Backup & Replication ensures you stay protected with critical security fixes, gain access to new features, and benefit from improved stability and performance. Below are some of the vulnerabilities that the 12.3.2 addresses. I will recommend taking a look at this KB article to see the vulnerabilities resolved in Veeam Backup & Replication 12.3.2. They are:CVE-2025-23121: Critical (CVSS 9.9): Remote code execution (RCE) by authenticated domain CVE-2025-24286: High (CVSS 7.2): Authenticated Backup Operator could modify backup jobs to execute arbitrary code users on domain-joined backup servers. CVE-2025-24287: Medium (CVSS 6.1): Local system users on Windows could modify directories to run arbitrary code; fixed in Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows 6.3.2In addition

I wanted to make you aware that a new Veeam & Pure blog is now available on veeam.com.  The blog is titled “Driving Enterprise Efficiency: VMWare Rightsizing Powered by Veeam ONE and Pure1”.The genesis of the project that is written up in this blog began over a year ago at Pure’s Accelerate 2024 user conference.  I attended a breakout session on what’s new in Pure Storage’s Pure1.  If you are not familiar with Pure1, it is a cloud-based platform that delivers real-time monitoring and AI-driven insights for managing and optimizing Pure Storage infrastructure.  It also had a new virtualization assessment module to help customers optimize and right size their VMware vSphere environments.Earlier this year, I was able to get my hands on Pure1 and try out the virtualization assessment in our alliances lab.  What I found was Pure1 virtualization assessment was quite complimentary to Veeam One vSphere optimization reports.  And using these tools in conjunction with each other provides more

Hello,i would like to ask, if its possible to set retention period of each database different.Based on Veeam helpcenter  there is an option to set - “delete backups older than”, which will delete all backups of all databases due not native SQL backup supported.Is there any option how to achieve that? thank you 

Hey Guys, Sorry for the weekend help, I am just too excited to leave VEEAM aloneI have googled and read other forum discussions to this topic but they all point towards a service not being started and in my case, everything is running, and I have rebooted everything also coming here for some helpI am in no rush this weekend, this can wait until MondayError message: Error: Managed session has failed: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it x.x.x.x:10005   Thanks in advance guys,

Not sure if I am missing something obvious but I have been poking around and I can’t find how to increase a CDP Proxy cache, without removing and re-adding. Thats seems a bit drastic and alot more work. Anyone been across this before ? Thanks Phil

As many of you are aware, VMware has basically tossed the SMB market to the wayside the past several mos (at least imo they have). Since then, Veeam has been listening to its customers regarding what other hypervisors they are looking at to transition to away from the Broadcom behemoth. Some made their voices heard on the Forums, asking for Proxmox support ; and some made requests for XCP-NG support.  Veeam answered the call for Proxmox lovers, going GA with a Proxmox Plugin in August 2024 (announcement in May 2024). Though Veeam has yet to announce any plans to officially support XCP-NG, I'm hopeful they will in the near future based on the comments in the XCP-NG Forums post I shared above; how soon "near future" is, is to be determined. 😏Because I believe Veeam will be supporting XCP-NG eventually, I thought I'd get ahead of the game and create some posts around this Xen-based hypervisor discussing my findings during testings, so the Community can get a first-hand look of what it ma

Ever since the early release of Veeam Backup for Proxmox VE, there has not been a lot of great community content highlighting how to administer PVE in an all-in-one post. Since then, the product has evolved significantly, so I decided to put together a comprehensive guide for the current plug-in version to help you get the most out of it. Below are some interesting post on Proxmox VE by ​@regnor Following Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware, the market faced significant disruptions. This led to many customers seeking alternative virtualisation platforms, with Proxmox VE quickly emerging as one of the preferred choice. Recognising both customer demand and Proxmox’s VE growing market share, Veeam expanded its Hypervisor support to include Proxmox VE. For the entire blog post, kindly take a look at the original article “Backup and Restore Proxmox VE virtual machines with Veeam”.Below is the architecture for Veeam Backup for Proxmox VE. The Veeam Backup for Proxmox VE architecture includes a

When deploying Veeam Agent for AIX in environments running on IBM Power Systems, you may face unexpected issues during VM cloning. I recently went through this process: after performing the initial manual deployment of the agent, I discovered that cloned VMs were replacing the original servers in the Veeam Protection Group instead of being added as new machines. In this blog post, I’ll walk you through:How I performed the initial deploy of Veeam Agent for AIX. Why cloned VMs replaced the original ones in VBR. The root cause of the UUID duplication issue. Step-by-step instructions to fix the problem. Initial Manual Deploy of Veeam Agent for AIX Before running into the UUID issue, I went through the full manual deployment of the Veeam Agent for AIX. Below is the exact installation process I followed: 1. Create a Protection Group in Veeam!Open the Veeam Backup & Replication console. Navigate to Inventory > Physical Infrastructure. Create a new Protection Group where your AIX server

Hi,I’m testing out the free Veeam Backup Agent for Windows (or whatever it’s called).  I’m using the option to automatically start a backup when I plug in my USB Hard Drive.  The option seems to work fine, but I don’t get any notification when the job starts so I always have to expand my tray and then hover over the icon to make sure it says Processing...Is there any way to get a standard Windows 11 pop up notification thing that would tell me when a job starts so I know it’s working?  I have the box checked for Enable control panel notifications, but I don’t know what that does because it doesn’t seem to do anything.Thanks!

Hi community, Another question I get a lot regarding object storage is the absence of Synthetic Full backup in the advanced setting:  There is no toggle for Synthetic option, but it can be activated via GFS: https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/backup/vsphere/direct_backup_to_object_storage_limitations.html?ver=120Unlike block or file storage type, it is not required to schedule additional fulls in Advanced, when configuring GFS:  Generally, object storage doesn’t need periodic Active Full backups due to the structure of the files and there is no notion of .vbk or .vib. I recommend using GFS option and not going to Advanced settings. Synthetic full on object storage works similarly to the one stored on XFS and REFS based repositories.  Thanks! 

I studied about Veeam’s GFS, as I understand, it’ll consume a lot of disk space to work?  If I want to keep 31 daily, 4 weekly, 12 monthly, I’ll end up with 1+4+12 = 17 full copies disk space + 30 daily incrementials ?  What if I create 3 different jobs on the same VM, daily (30days), weekly (4 weeks), monthly (12 months)I’ll end up with:one daily full + 29 daily incrementalsone weekly full + 3 weekly incrementalsone monthly full + 11 monthly incrementals Total 3 full + 43 increments, should use much less space than build-in GFS?     

Hello, I thought I would give the new BETA2 version of the Veeam Linux deployment a spin. Booting up to the jeOS, I was surprised to see two new options:Veeam Infrastructure Appliance Veeam Infrastructure Appliance (with iSCSI & NVME)Detailed in the screenshot below, with the BETA1 version following:BETA2 BETA1Is this the new name for a Proxy or is this something else? And, the thing I’m probably most excited about….are we finally getting NVMe fabric support on Veeam?