Skip to main content
Question

Mejor estrategia para respaldar un file server de Windows con 20 TB

  • June 25, 2026
  • 4 comments
  • 21 views

Buenas comunidad.

 

Estoy protegiendo una carga de trabajo de Windows 2012 y 2029 (maquinas virtuales de VMware) y que es utilizado como file server, ambos tienen discos de 20 TB y 15 TB aprox de información, y millones de archivos, esto se almacena en un repositorio de Catalyst de StoreOnce (configurado según recomendaciones de Veeam y HP) con un Gateway mediante SAN, con política de 15 puntos de restauración y GFS.

 

El problema lo tengo en lentitud del respaldo y con los GFS ocupan mucho espacio.

Les consulto si esto esta bien, o recomendarían algún ajuste.

4 comments

coolsport00
Forum|alt.badge.img+23
  • Veeam Legend
  • June 25, 2026

Hi@tavoli - did you reach out to Veeam Support? They are your best source to help out.

What kind of backup are you running? NAS/File Share? What does the Backup Job task list say your bottleneck is? Do you have your target Repository configured for Fast Clone? This should make your GFS files get created extremely fast. Also, what Veeam version & product are you using? Please provide much more detail and we can try to assist. But, it's also your best bet to reach out to Support.

Best.


Andanet
Forum|alt.badge.img+13
  • Veeam Legend
  • June 25, 2026

Hi ​@tavoli 
First of all, you're lucky to be using a future operating system like Windows 2029 (I know that was just a typo). 🤣
It's normal for standard, and bigger, VM backup to be slow, even if you are using a physical server connected to the SAN. 
I can suggest two approaches.

The first is what ​Shane suggested: add the servers as shares and back them in that way (using a general-purpose proxy).

The second option, if your SAN can do it, is to enable a storage snapshot. This will reduce the load on the virtual infrastructure and make backups faster.

Please check official documentation for those two solution.

My 2 cents


CMF
Forum|alt.badge.img+8
  • Veeam Legend
  • June 26, 2026

Hi ​@tavoli ,

What backup transport mode are you currently using (Direct SAN, Virtual Appliance, or Network mode / NBD)?
If you are using Network mode, it may be worth evaluating the other transport options, as they can significantly improve backup performance.

https://helpcenter.veeam.com/docs/vbr/userguide/transport_modes.html?ver=13 

 

Backing up the file shares directly could be an alternative. However, please note that this approach may lead to higher licensing costs, as it requires an additional VUL for every 500 GB of data, or alternatively, a dedicated capacity-based license.

Regarding GFS retention: this is expected behavior. GFS restore points are additional full backups that are stored on the repository, which naturally results in increased storage consumption.

Regards

Chalid


HunterLAFR
Forum|alt.badge.img+10
  • Veeam Legend
  • June 26, 2026

Hola!

aquí veo varias cosas. 
puedes pasarnos un dibujo de tu arquitectura?

como te han preguntado, van por SAN?, VSAN, cabina NFS?

el foco es distinto, depende de tu red, si es de 1gbps, 10gbps o más, si el destino es HDD, híbrido, nvme, 

por el tema de uso de almacenamiento del GFS, el destino podría ser un appliance con de duplicación, así, ahorrarías en espacio.

 

nos vas contando,

un abrazo