Skip to main content

I am tired of free.....

  • June 25, 2026
  • 2 comments
  • 37 views

GerhardGibbs
Forum|alt.badge.img+3

A very wise man once told me: “It is more often than not cheaper to pay for something than to receive it for free”. So yes, you read the headline correct.

What might be happening in the ICT arena with AI seems like a movie some of us has seen before. Remember that thing called the “Dot-Com Bubble”? I feel the need to explain, as in talking to some up and coming technical resources I got blank stares before I realized most of them were not born yet when it happened.

The Boom: From 1995 to the year 2000 investors went wild investing in any company ending in “.com” – simply because they were internet based. No thorough due diligence, most of these startups had little to no profitability, unrealistic business models and no proven revenue streams – it was all based on the “dream”. Trillions of dollars were invested, so much the Nasdaq rose 582% during this period.

Things were great in the industry back then, parties insane and money being spent on everything except common sense.

The Burst: Early 2000, the Federal Reserve, to combat inflation, raised interest rates and investors realized many Dot-Coms couldn’t generate earnings or deliver value. This sparked massive panic selling-off of those companies. The Nasdaq plummeted 77%, most cash strapped startups (more than 5 000 of them) became worthless overnight and $5 Trillion were wiped out, becoming the leading cause of the 2001 recession.

What have we seen in AI thus far? Here I must comment that even AI is hesitant to answer direct questions – giving answers like a well-trained politician:

Ø  $1.6-trillion total investment expected to grow to $5 trillion by 2030

Ø  Only 6% of companies are seeing a meaningful bottom-line impact

Ø  AI’s contribution to 2025 GDP growth – “basically zero”

Ø  I’m getting answers with words like “could add”, “potential” and something that really scares me: “AI investment is also supported by unprecedented government funding”

At the end of the day, it looks, like in 2000, it is you and me who is going to pay the bill, again. When last did you try buy affordable RAM or SSDs? Now they in short supply due to AI datacenters being built, back then our shortages were due to a thing called Y2K.

So, what does it have to do with “free”?

During the “Dot-Com Boom” we had the 1st “Browser war” – Netscape vs Microsoft. Then after the burst we had the 2nd “Browser War” – Microsoft; Firefox and Google. We know who won – yes of course: Google with 70% current market share.

How did they win – they could monetize the browser, by making it “free”, and in doing so making you the product. This has sparked a business model now being used by so many “free” tools/apps I can’t really think about one not using it. That is the free I am tired of.

Unthinkable a couple of years ago: I am paying to not be advertised to; I am paying to not be the product. Maybe better put in old man’s terms – I am prepared to pay for the product or service, been doing it for my music and entertainment, now doing it for my browser.

I think the 3rd “Browser war” might be on its way. I can only comment on Comet – and yes, I pay for it as I see the value. Built with agentic AI at its core, it makes “browsing” a breeze – not hundreds of pages to scroll through, no top searches being the landing site for companies who paid the most in advertising, no long searches for hidden truths – just answers and facts.

Which brings me to the current ICT climate I find myself in. After the burst of the Dot-Com bubble, the bubble still went on. There is no reputable company without an online presence, integrating websites with workflows/customer retention/expansion strategies and more. Companies who survived – and thrived – did it so by doing things right, from the start.

Eventually I get to something Veeam’ish!

I want to commend Veeam on the purchase of SecuritiAI and for starting to build Security/Governance/Compliance and Privacy into the resilience platform. This now allows us to not only start delivering safe scalable AI, which business has been pushing us to do, it now gives us the tools to do it the right way, from the start. More than that - to highlight the critical importance of DSPM across fragmented business silos, getting departments to actually talk to each other. It is the right thing to do – not only for AI – but for our business.

Enough said – grab the popcorn, there is a movie to watch!

2 comments

Iams3le
Forum|alt.badge.img+14
  • June 25, 2026

> I think the 3rd “Browser war” might be on its way. I can only comment on Comet – and yes, I pay for it as I see the value. Built with agentic AI at its core, it makes “browsing” a breeze – not hundreds of pages to scroll through, no top searches being the landing site for companies who paid the most in advertising, no long searches for hidden truths – just answers and facts.

 

I think other browsers such as Chrome and Edge all work this way. But then, do you already use “Comet” at you organisation? I read a guidance from CISA some time ago, the NSA, and international partners highlights that AI-integrated browsers are currently advancing faster than traditional security frameworks can reliably assess and control. How are you managing this?
 


GerhardGibbs
Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Author
  • VUG Leader
  • June 26, 2026

Thank you for the insight and of course something to take seriously.

I think it all comes back to DSPM and your cyber security controls, and controlling your infrastructure? As stats show - just about all companies have various unregistered AI “browsers/Apps” and struggling to stop the use. Not seeing myself as the expert on the subject in my small mind I like the statement the CIS put out:

“To date, the CIS has not observed any brand new threats, only threat actors using AI to facilitate existing attempts. This further advocates the importance of cyber security fundamentals.”