VeeamOn Tours 2024
Hello,@MicoolPaul where is this coming from?Ive used ReFS 64K without issues but you do need to disable the integrity feature to avoid potential corruption. It confused a customer and I cannot find a source for that. Thanks,Hannes
Hmm, where does it say anything on “corruption”?I agree, my colleagues should avoid adjectives like “error-prone”. The “error-prone” refers to “reconfiguration” and not to REFS as far as I see
perfect, thanks. I also asked my colleagues to clarify / simplify wording
@JMeixner : before changing the user guide (or maybe even the product), we need to be sure what the real reason is. I got a case number from @Rick Vanover , but that does not mention anything about restore issues.So my question is: is there a case number for the restore issues and could I please get that case number?
@HannesKback then replied that on V11 AAP did that trick just fine, but further testing showed that it was not possible. At least not without providing an account with administrative access corresponding to the VM.it wasn’t me who replied that ;-) But I did not want to start a discussion, whether the persistent guest agent could be a solution or not, because I was not 100% sure. I postponed testing it a couple of times… but your post made me test it now and I can confirm what you say and I believed in Prague: a local admin account is required for authentication. A local admin account requirement makes sense, because otherwise any “random user” with a VBR server could just take over the machine. I agree, that it’s a valid request. Just thinking out loud: would you be comfortable to deploy certificates manually on the machines instead of providing username / password centrally?
Hannes is not taking us seriously in the forum! :-) hmm, why do you think so? The first request can make sense, but it adds complexity with hard to estimate benefit and currently only one customer asking for it. So let’s see how many others ask for features like thatthe second thing is a different topic / technology and it’s confusing for every reader to have two topics / discussions mixed in one thread :-)
Great recap guys! We are getting closer to V12, i’m happy my guess was close hehe! @HannesK great blog post series about VHR, thank you for sharing this. happy to hear, that you liked it :-)By the way: I silently changed the partitioning scheme yesterday because /home was too small for capacity tier offload… https://www.veeam.com/kb4283
correct. It’s not in the user guide, because it’s internal only :-)I already asked to make it official
bei mir ist V11 ziemlich identisch mit V12 und der Pfad ist E:\Backup\VeeamZIP\HK-NanoD2023-03-03T100253_603A\HK-Nano.vm-56528D2023-03-03T100253_543D.vbkwäre eventuell Wert mit Support zu checken
Hello,as we never found the root cause and LVM seems to be no general problem, we did not document anything.If anyone of you have a support case number with more details that, that would be useful.Best regards,Hannes
@BertrandFR : thanks for the comments. I assume that the updated version of the blog should be fine now.I talked to Petr (the product manager you mention from Prague) whether we want to add a checkbox to enable CBT directly in the job options. That was the main point from my side when starting the conversation with Ali (who then wrote the blog post - thanks for that!)
not really. for block cloning, it has to be one file system. so the abstraction of different tiers has to happen at the storage level. I never tried Linux caching / tiering solutions, so I cannot give any advice here.
just for information… sandroalved did a duplicate post on R&D forums with https://forums.veeam.com/post493912.html#p493912
@BertrandFR :putting an official feature request to the R&D forums is a good idea. Currently there is only an internal thread that customers cannot add “plus 1” we have that feature request already tracked and I would add you to that request There is a support tool that does what you ask for. But it’s slow. So the main question is: how fast per GByte log files is that script?
@JMousqueton : it should be available from support by opening a ticket and asking for it. I know it existed some years ago. I’m not 100% it was adopted to V12.
I guess that shows the challenge… log bundles are often 5GB - 50GB, I even heard of 200GB. I’m also not a developer, so I’m technically not able to improve the code to make it faster.
> For the FR on the r&d forum , do you need one FR per request? I mean coud i create a root FR for all or I would start with one thread in the VBR forums. A list of attributes that should be anonymized would be useful.For the database, that seems to open a can of worms. If foreign keys are involved, that would cost huge amounts of development resources.
Hello,interesting device and interesting error you ran into.The ISO formats everything it can see. Maybe we can add something that excludes USB drives. I will add it to the bugs list.Thanks for reporting! 👍Best regards,Hannes
schlechte Nachrichten… es ist nicht gefixed in 12.1. Dima meinte “it’s complicated” :-(
Hello,not sure which advice I should give… if you want to do it now, then you must enable SSH. If you have time to wait for CP1, then you don’t need SSH.Best regards,Hannes
Hello,unfortunately I don’t have a time frame right now. Some non-technical challenges came up to get the ISO officially supported. I’m working on finding solutions, but right now it’s hard to predict where it goes. We removed the old ISO, because the new ISO would not be on Ubuntu 20.04 and I don’t want people to waste time on reporting issues on something that won’t be used in future.Best regards,Hannes
sure, nothing is wrong with Ubuntu 20.04
Hello,please see my comment above… there is no link available until we release a new ISO :-)Thanks for your understanding,Hannes
it would be one ISO and no choice for the customer which OS. Customers who want to select the OS, can continue without ISO. It’s an appliance - customers don’t need to worry about the OS :-)The ISO requires a version after 12.1 because 12.1 requires SSH for the initial connection. The ISO won’t have SSH.
Thanks all! It would be nice if there is an approximate date. So I can decide to wait for the ISO or work on myself. If you ever built Ubuntu / Debian ISOs before, then I would suggest to do it yourself and just add the DISA STIG hardening scripts https://github.com/VeeamHub/veeam-hardened-repository (I built ISOs 12 years ago myself and remember it’s not that complicated. My colleague who built this one told me that it works still more or less the same)I guess a few things in the script need to be adjusted for Ubuntu 22.04, but most of the things should just work.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
