It was only in the past month I looked and saw it on there, but it wasn’t on there with immutability support when I saw it btw.

Gonna be a question for Veeam

Doesn’t look like this list is updated now.  Maybe @Rick Vanover or @HannesK can shed some light.

Chance I had a screenshot from the previous results. Would like to know the reason why they disappeared.

Could be the table isn’t fully populated as I got a bunch of options when I looked this time. QNAP are still saying they’re Veeam ready as object and object with immutability here: https://www.qnap.com/en/software/quobjects

Hello @kristofpoppe I am checking internally with Veeam Ready team

Thanks @Pybarra I’m working an a proposal for an architecture and just want to be 100% sure that we’re using qualified and HCL’ed devices.

Your very welcome @kristofpoppe once I get an update. I will let you know.

I can confirm it used to be on and thank you @Pybarra for stepping up here. My suspicion is it is being requalified for V12 or something like that. Or a new QNAP rev.

The immutability however is still qualified, view as of today:
 

Folks,

QNAP has recently finished their v12 Veeam Ready qualification tests.  The Veeam Ready site should be updated in the near future once their submission has been reviewed and approved.

Thanks for reaching out.

Updated again by Veeam Ready team @kristofpoppe https://www.veeam.com/alliance-partner-integrations-qualifications.html?alliancePartner=qnap-systems-inc&type%5B%5D=object-storage-target&page=1

These QNAP articles were un-published some time ago as some additional clarifications had to be done. Corrected articles are published today. 

Cheers, @SteveF !

All articles were published again and we added some information regarding non supported configurations to some of them. If you follow defaults and best practices, no limitation.