Skip to main content
StickyVeeam Oxford Style Debate #2

And the Winners Are… Veeam Oxford Style Debate #2 – Results Are Here!

  • July 20, 2026
  • 9 comments
  • 89 views
Madi.Cristil
Forum|alt.badge.img+8

Another debate, another reminder of why I love this format. Thank you to everyone who took part in Episode 2 of our Oxford Style Debate. It was great to see so many well-reasoned arguments, different viewpoints, and real-world experiences shared throughout the discussion.

This month's statement was:

"Tape is dead — stop living in the past and use a real archival solution like Object Storage or dedicated deduplication appliances."

To help select this month's winners, I invited @Mildur  from Product Management to review the discussion and share his perspective.

A huge thank you to Fabian for sharing his expertise and helping identify the most insightful arguments from both sides of the debate.

Winner Against “Tape is dead” - ​@matheusgiovanini 

'’matheusgiovanini made the strongest case against the statement by sharing a real recovery scenario from his own experience. In his mentioned case, the backup server, repositories, and storage replication were all compromised, and offline tape was the only surviving recovery option. He provided a practical example of restoring around 130 VMs from tape. 

What stood out most was his consistency throughout the discussion. He also listened to counter arguments, like concerns about verification or extra work, and answered them fairly instead of ignoring them — but he kept his position clear and continued to defend it.'’

 

Winner For “Tape is NOT dead” - @jos.maliepaard 

'’jos.maliepaard had the clearest argument in favor of "FOR". While many “FOR” arguments ended up drifting toward “tape is still useful in some cases,” he stayed focused on why tape can fail as a reliable modern recovery strategy. His points were based on real operational issues: tapes that are not truly air-gapped, poor storage practices, labeling challenges, and compatibility issues with older tape drives. His strongest point was that tapes are often not re-checked for years. As a result, corrupted, outdated, or even infected backups can remain unnoticed until the moment they are needed.'’

 

That wraps up Episode 2 of our Oxford Style Debate!

Congratulations to @matheusgiovanini  and @jos.maliepaard  for presenting the most insightful arguments on each side of the debate. Your community badges are on the way, and you've both secured your place in the year-end challenge.

A huge thank you to everyone who participated, shared their perspective, and helped make this another great discussion. I can't wait to see what Episode 3 brings!

9 comments

Tommy O'Shea
Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Veeam Legend
  • July 20, 2026

Congrats ​@matheusgiovanini and ​@jos.maliepaard, great arguments all around. To be honest, as soon as I saw the topic of the debate, I knew Matheus was going to come in with a lot of insight given his many articles regarding tape.


Iams3le
Forum|alt.badge.img+15
  • July 20, 2026

Firstly, thank you ​@Mildur for the comprehensive review.

@matheusgiovanini, it seems I saw this coming. Congratulations, your arguments were solid without drifting, and you continued to defend it. Congratulations to you as well ​@jos.maliepaard. It’s not easy to remain consistent and stand by your position when most people are leaning toward the other side.


jos.maliepaard
Forum|alt.badge.img+10

Cool format and very informative to read everyones standpoint. Congrats ​@matheusgiovanini on your badge. 


matheusgiovanini
Forum|alt.badge.img+10

Thank you so much, ​@Madi.Cristil  and ​@Mildur!

I was really happy to take part in this debate because I had the opportunity to bring a perspective based on real day-to-day operations and recovery scenarios. It was also great to see so many different viewpoints about tape, including both its strengths and its limitations. Discussions like this help us learn from one another, challenge our own assumptions, and grow as professionals.

Congratulations, ​@jos.maliepaard on your badge! You presented very strong and valid arguments. 


matheusgiovanini
Forum|alt.badge.img+10

Congrats ​@matheusgiovanini and ​@jos.maliepaard, great arguments all around. To be honest, as soon as I saw the topic of the debate, I knew Matheus was going to come in with a lot of insight given his many articles regarding tape.

Thank you so much, ​@Tommy O'Shea, I really appreciate that. Tape has been a big part of my day-to-day work, so I was very happy to bring some of those real-world experiences into the debate and create blogs around tape. 


matheusgiovanini
Forum|alt.badge.img+10

Firstly, thank you ​@Mildur for the comprehensive review.

@matheusgiovanini, it seems I saw this coming. Congratulations, your arguments were solid without drifting, and you continued to defend it. Congratulations to you as well ​@jos.maliepaard. It’s not easy to remain consistent and stand by your position when most people are leaning toward the other side.

Thanks C! I really appreciate your words. ​@Iams3le.


Chris.Childerhose
Forum|alt.badge.img+22

Congrats 🎉 ​@matheusgiovanini and ​@jos.maliepaard on winning debate two.  Was definitely some good for and against post to read.


kciolek
Forum|alt.badge.img+6
  • Influencer
  • July 20, 2026

Congrats ​@Mildur and ​@jos.maliepaard!


Nico Losschaert
Forum|alt.badge.img+13

Congrats to the winners and indeed both starting points are right, it’s not a black-white situation.