Skip to main content

**PLACE HOLDER** - UK VUG - 17th April 2024 - Session When Direct to Object Storage isn’t so direct! - Michael Paul


Cragdoo
Forum|alt.badge.img+9

Discussion/Comments on session presented by Michael Paul

7 comments

Chris.Childerhose
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Veeam Legend, Veeam Vanguard
  • 8506 comments
  • April 16, 2024

Not going to be there but will tune in to this chat. 👍


chris.harvey

You had me at “Object Storage”… to (almost) quote a movie.

 

Chris


Cragdoo
Forum|alt.badge.img+9
  • Author
  • Veeam Vanguard
  • 130 comments
  • April 17, 2024

Anyone here joining us “live” during Michael’s session?


Chris.Childerhose
Forum|alt.badge.img+21
  • Veeam Legend, Veeam Vanguard
  • 8506 comments
  • April 17, 2024

Joined to listen in (little late).


dips
Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Veeam Legend
  • 808 comments
  • April 17, 2024
Cragdoo wrote:

Anyone here joining us “live” during Michael’s session?

I am 


dips
Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Veeam Legend
  • 808 comments
  • April 17, 2024

So a question I had about Object Storage. 

 

When trying to determine a external Object Storage provider, how important is data portability for you? Is that a major factor? 


MicoolPaul
Forum|alt.badge.img+23
  • 2362 comments
  • April 18, 2024

Because of the Veeam data platform, the portability question mainly is answered by Veeam’s ability to lift and shift the data. I’ve raised some feature requests to improve this, but I’m glad that Veeam can do this so that we can see data migration between incompatible object storage types such as from Azure to S3.