VeeamON 2024 - Use Code "COMMUNITY10" for 10% Off!
Not sure if you can post back here once that happens@Chris.Childerhose I will do my best to post something here when we release V12 Veeam Ready.
@Chris.Childerhose when we launch the v12 Veeam Ready Program (soon) there will be a filter on the page to allow you to select the partner solutions that successfully tested their SOSAPI integration. That will be the most reliable way to see what partner solutions have SOSAPI enabled since the list is growing as we speak.
@vAdmin QNAP QuObjects should work with the AWS CLI and the commands that I used in the article. I have a QNAP device in my home lab and will load QuObjects at some point to test this. I will post an update when that testing occurs.
Derek,I used Ceph 17 (Quincy Stable) for the example in this blog. You are correct via Wasabi’s website, creating the locked bucket will not cause you any issues.However, if after you create the bucket you were to go to the setting of the bucket and turn on/configure the “Bucket-Level Retention” shown below then you would have the issues described above. So avoid any such settings via any product’s interface and let Veeam do the work for you. Hope this answers your question 👍
@GreenHenry I spoke to Quantum about this question and they indicated that they could have support for a capability like what you described in the future, but they do not right now. Currently there isn’t a way to control which shares are accessible via which ethernet ports.Thanks for the great question. It’s ideas and feedback like this that allow us to strengthen our joint solutions.
@GreenHenry I reached out to my friends at Quantum and here are the responses to your questions: “The NFS protocol is “NFS v3 or NFS v4”, the exact version is negotiated with the client. Samba is based on 4.5.3-7781, with Quantum’s own modifications. It’s an older version but has been modified from the original so the version is not exactly 4.5.3. S3 protocol is not supported unfortunately. DXi can be installed in AWS with S3 storage and used as a replication target, however, so cloud is supported. A version writing directly to S3 is planned by the end of the year. Multi tenancy: The short answer is “yes.” You can setup operator level users with access to different shares who can only control assigned shares. But, these operators have visibility to other shared parts of the system, so the tenants would have knowledge of each other. Of course, you can just have shares for different users with different authentications, but if you give access to login to DXi each user will have visibil
@Link State you are correct that the DXi v5000 is a dedupe appliance. Hope you enjoy it.
@GreenHenry sorry for the delay in replying to you. @Chris.Childerhose did a great job picking up the ball and answering your questions. I used an NFR license and setup the DXi as a dedupe appliance, but the NFS target use case is a great alternative.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.